I look forward to learning more about how Predident Obama would like to support an economy that requires less absent fathers and permits more present fathers.
christinelu: re: tragic murder/suicideincidents. there’s often a link to antidepressants & SSRIs that no one wants to talk about in public. guns blamed.
moritherapy: RT @christinelu re: tragic murder/suicides. often a link to antidepressants & SSRIs that no-one wants to talk about in public. guns blamed.
christinelu: @blueberrio never mentioned that SSRIs are the only cause. and trust me, factoring them in does not equate to ignorance of facts on suicide.
Maybe Looking at Extreme Scenarios Helps to Bring Things into Perspective
Pretend that in a coutry of about 250 million people, about 150 million people belong to the labor force.
Scenario #1: 1 Employer, 150 million jobs (as “employees”)
That would essentially be: nationalization of all industries.
Scenario #2: 150 million Businesses (each with no employees)
Under this scenario, there would be no jobs — only the “self-employment” type of work.
Which would you prefer?
If you had to choose between these extremes, that is.
Many People Seem to be Opposed to Nationalization
That would then appear to mean, that they are in favor of “self mployment” (especially if “big business” is going bust left and right). So then the logical consequence is to ask: How can the government make it easy for peopl to “start their own business” — and (or course) become profitable?
over the past couple months, and I have come to conclusion that it’s a bogus hoax. In truth, people should be talking about complanies that are too big to survive.
IT’s a Small World
After all, small is lean. Online, small is clean. Most of all: small is competitive. The world is small — it’s actually just a dot. No one should be talking about landing on Mars, we need to concentrate on landing a deal with our own planet that will allow us to survive, and we need to land deals with our brothers and sisters that will keep us healthy and safe from strife.
The Future is in the Home Office
If you want the “quick and dirty” straightforward slogan: We don’t need no employers. The World 2.0 is a global village. What we need are contracts that work. What we need are healthcare systems that aren’t tied to the notion of employment, because employment is DEAD. Think about that the next time you buy something on ebay.
What We Need are People Skilled in Web Skills: Online Reading, Online Writing, Online Communications, Online Interaction,…
These are the skills that will enable business entrepreneurs to hammer out sucessful businesses tomorrow — and that is why we need to invest in such human capital … today!
is going through a major crash-test right now… and that it is (as Obama has said before) basically like pressing the reset button now.
What America Needs
is a new New Deal — I don’t think an old-fashioned New Deal will be sufficient to make the USA competitive in the New World economy.
What do you mean — “New World Economy”?
The World has change significantly since the last “Great Depression” almost 80 years ago — in the early 30’s, sustainability was not an issue. Today, it the teh issue. And in this context, technology in the USA is very outdated.
First and Foremost
Americans need to listen to President Obama’s speech in Berlin, and the citizens of the United States of America need to restart their own egos: America is no longer the leader — America is now the laggard.
“Conversative” is a very old word (meaning something like “to be inclined to converse”). And so what we want here is conversation — not so much formal rules (though a foundation of basic rules help to keep the conversations civil). We aren’t really against rules, just more for conversation.
IntenseDebate supports the following HTML [...]more →
will follow now, thx
Recent Comments